Freedom of a Locked Room

I picked this short article up yesterday and will use it to leverage a short discussion on compliance, judgment, and the difference between the terms capable and qualified. Here it is:
Pilot Tells Passengers 'I'm Not Qualified to Land Plane'
Thursday, December 18, 2008
A pilot with more than 30 years experience was forced to turn his plane around — because he was not qualified to land in fog, an airline confirmed Thursday. Passengers on the 8:45 AM Flybe flight to Paris were just minutes away from landing at their destination when they were told they would have to go all the way back to Cardiff, England.
One passenger from Bristol missed a job interview in France because of the incident. Cassandra Grant explained: "Twenty minutes outside Paris, the captain said, 'Unfortunately I'm not qualified to land the plane in Paris. They are asking for a level two qualification and I only have a level five. We'll have to fly back.'"
A spokeswoman for the airline said Flybe, a low-cost airline, backed the pilot's decision "100 percent." He had recently switched from flying a Bombardier Q300 to a Bombardier Q400 and has not completed the "requisite low-visibility training," she said. The dense fog covering Charles de Gaulle airport had not been there when the flight took off, she added. The plane was already three hours late due to bad weather in Wales. The pilot's situation is "quite unusual but probably not unheard of," according to the Civil Aviation Authority.
The obvious slant of this article – and the initial reaction from many readers – is “What kind of pilot with 30 years of experience can’t land in low visibility conditions?” The key to answering this question lies in defining the difference between what an individual is capable of doing, and what he is formally qualified to do.
Capabilities > Qualifications = Discipline and Compliance
There are many times when your capabilities will exceed your qualifications. I suspect this was likely the case with the airline Captain in this article. Although frustrating, this was a non-decision for the pilot. The decision was made for him by policy. Unfortunately, not everyone has the level of maturity or understanding to see the world though the simple but powerful lens of compliance.
Individuals who have this type of uncompromising personal and professional discipline operate with purpose and clarity – what I often call the “freedom of a locked room.” Absent an emergency situation, the rules make the decision for you, as well as protecting you from the second guessing of armchair quarterbacks operating at groundspeed zero. Compliance is the link between good policy and safe mission accomplishment. There is no need to ponder unauthorized options based on what your physical skill set might or might not be on any given day. In an ironic twist to the angle of this article – a less professional airman might have flown the approach into Paris and made the landing.
Qualifications > Capabilities = Courage and Judgment
But there are also times when our qualifications exceed our capabilities – and this is a much more difficult test of professionalism. Let’s assume for the moment that this Captain was qualified to fly to the lower visibility minimums, but was having difficulty flying a stabilized approach on this particular day due to any one of a hundred factors. Would he try to will the aircraft to the ground by continuing an unstabilized approach because his qualifications said he should be able to fly it – or execute a missed approach and proceed to an alternate based on his subjective evaluation of his limited abilities on this day?
Qualification levels are fixed sums – coldly objective, they not affected by mission or peer pressures or the urgency of the moment. Or at least they shouldn't be. Capabilities on the other hand, are subjective, and by definition can be altered by different states of personal readiness (physiological or psychological) or internal or external pressures to perform. Accurately ascertaining our capability level in real time is true connoisseurship, and the decision to admit when personal proficiency is the limiting factor is one of the most distinguishing marks of a true pro.
What kind of pilot tells his passengers he “can’t land the plane?” Whether the decision is based on professional discipline, compliance or personal self-awareness, the answer is the same - a professional one. Well done, Captain.


